William Whewell (1840) Philosophy of the inductive sciences
Edward O Wilson (1999) Consilience: The Unity of Knowledge
Monodisciplinarity refers to an approach or method that is confined within the boundaries of a single academic discipline or field of study. In a monodisciplinary framework, research, teaching, and problem-solving are conducted strictly according to the principles, methodologies, and knowledge base of one specific discipline. This approach tends to focus on depth rather than breadth, emphasizing specialized expertise within a particular area.
For example, a monodisciplinary study of climate change might focus exclusively on the atmospheric science aspects, without integrating perspectives from related fields like sociology, economics, or environmental policy. While monodisciplinarity can lead to deep expertise and highly specialized knowledge, it can also limit the scope of inquiry and miss out on the insights that might emerge from an interdisciplinary or multidisciplinary approach.
Pluridisciplinarity involves the juxtaposition of disciplines with minimal integration. Each discipline approaches a common issue or topic independently, without any real interaction or collaboration between them. The boundaries between the disciplines remain clear, and the contributions from each discipline are additive rather than integrative.
Multidisciplinarity occurs when multiple disciplines work on a common theme or problem, but each discipline retains its methods, concepts, and frameworks. While there is some coordination, the disciplines largely operate in parallel, contributing their own perspectives without significant integration or synthesis of knowledge.
Interdisciplinarity is the integration of knowledge, methods, and frameworks from different disciplines to address a complex issue. Disciplines work together to create a synthesized understanding that transcends individual disciplinary perspectives. This approach often results in the creation of new concepts, theories, or solutions that wouldn’t be possible within a single discipline.
Crossdisciplinarity involves the application of methods or concepts from one discipline to another, typically without fully integrating or synthesizing the disciplines. The primary discipline remains dominant, while insights from another discipline are applied to enhance or extend the primary discipline’s perspective.
Transdisciplinarity goes beyond the integration of disciplines by engaging with non-academic knowledge systems, including stakeholders from outside academia such as community members, policymakers, or industry experts. This approach seeks to address real-world problems by transcending disciplinary boundaries and integrating multiple forms of knowledge to create holistic solutions.
Postdisciplinarity refers to a move beyond traditional disciplinary boundaries altogether. It questions the very existence and relevance of disciplines, advocating for a more fluid, flexible approach to knowledge creation that isn’t confined by predefined categories. This approach is often seen in fields that challenge the conventional structure of academia.
Tomas Pernecky's book "Postdisciplinary Knowledge" opens with the chapter "An Unintroduction to Postdisciplinarity," which explores the concept of postdisciplinarity by intentionally avoiding a traditional introduction. Postdisciplinarity, characterized by its openness, lack of rigid structure, and resistance to singular definitions, cannot be confined to any one perspective or methodology. The chapter emphasizes that postdisciplinarity is not a paradigm; instead, it challenges conventional paradigms and encourages intellectual freedom. By examining various strands of postdisciplinary scholarship and resisting the urge to define it against other systems of knowledge organization, Pernecky argues for a fluid, inclusive approach to knowledge that embraces creativity and resists the constraints of traditional academic boundaries. Read the PDF below!
Undisciplinarity involves the intentional negation or refusal of disciplinary boundaries, seeking to dismantle or bypass the constraints imposed by disciplines. It advocates for an open-ended approach to inquiry that is not limited by the methodologies, concepts, or frameworks of established disciplines. This approach often involves a critical stance towards the very idea of disciplinarity, aiming to create knowledge that is free from traditional academic constraints.
These definitions follow a progression from minimal interaction and cohesion (pluridisciplinarity) to more integrated and even critical approaches that challenge or transcend traditional disciplinary boundaries (undisciplinarity).
Copyright © 2020–2024 [UN]DISCIPLINED VENTURES - All Rights Reserved.
Powered by GoDaddy
We use cookies to analyze website traffic and optimize your website experience. By accepting our use of cookies, your data will be aggregated with all other user data.